Recently, Iran has emerged as a consistent threat in the realm of cybersecurity. Although its capabilities may not match those of countries like Russia or China, experts note that Iran excels at amplifying the impact of its operations. Jeff Greene, the former executive assistant director of cybersecurity at CISA, indicates that Iran’s cyber activities have raised concerns, particularly following its series of distributed-denial-of-service attacks targeting Wall Street institutions. These incidents, along with the 2012 cyber onslaught against Saudi Aramco and Qatar’s Rasgas, marked some of the earliest and most destructive acts against critical infrastructure.
Currently, Iran is strategizing its potential responses, considering its inventory of cyber tools, networks, and operatives. Given past behavior, it is likely that Iran’s means of retaliation will extend beyond conventional military strikes and may include operations well outside the Middle East.
This situation raises significant uncertainties, particularly regarding future developments. Historical context can provide insight; there’s an anecdote from the 1970s involving Henry Kissinger and a Chinese leader—either Mao Tse-Tung or Zhou Enlai—who, when asked about the implications of the French Revolution, remarked, “Too soon to tell.” While likely apocryphal, this story underscores a broader truth relevant to the ancient Persian empire: history unfolds across extensive time frames.
Despite aspirations for democratic reforms in Iran, the CIA’s recent assessments indicate that, should Supreme Leader Khamenei be removed, hardline members from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are likely to take his place. The ongoing retaliatory actions by Iran against various Middle Eastern targets following significant regime losses, including the reported death of senior officials, illustrate that the government remains resilient in the face of pressure.
Iran’s modern history has been shaped by pivotal interactions with American foreign policy, notably marked by the 1953 CIA-backed coup, the 1979 revolution that ousted the shah, and now, potential repercussions from the 2026 U.S. attacks. Scott Anderson, in his recent book *King of Kings*, emphasizes the revolutionary impact of the 1979 events, suggesting that the Iranian revolution ranks alongside the American, French, and Russian revolutions in its global significance.
As we navigate this potentially transformative moment, it is essential to remain cautious about quick conclusions or celebratory remarks, particularly given the far-reaching implications of Iran’s historical upheavals.
In a recent media interview, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth emphasized the military’s and Trump administration’s approach as a direct message to adversaries, embodying a mentality characterized as “F-A-F-O.” Currently, U.S. military operations over Iran signal the “F-A” phase, while the complex tapestry of Iran’s history illustrates that the “F-O” stage—where the broader consequences become clear—may remain far off.
Your feedback is valued. Please share your thoughts at mail@wired.com.