Government,
Healthcare,
Industry Specific
Funding: A Solution to Planned Cuts in Rural Health Under the Big Beautiful Bill?

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has announced a substantial $50 billion grant initiative aimed at revolutionizing rural healthcare systems. This comprehensive program, part of the “Big Beautiful” bill enacted by President Donald Trump in July, encompasses significant investments in information technology and cybersecurity.
Available to states in allocations of $10 billion annually over the next five years, the funding is intended to alleviate financial strains; however, the grants may not fully counteract the Medicaid cuts anticipated for rural healthcare over the upcoming decade.
The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that rural hospitals across the U.S. could face a loss of between $137 billion and $155 billion in Medicaid funding over the next ten years due to the tax and spending law passed under Trump, which is linked to an overall projected reduction of $1 trillion in Medicaid by 2036.
In August, the American Hospital Association conveyed concerns in a letter to Dr. Mehmet Oz of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), observing that approximately half of rural hospitals are operating at a loss and are in dire need of support to remain functional. The association indicated that many rural facilities are struggling due to low patient volumes, hefty fixed costs, antiquated infrastructure, and workforce shortages, which could pose risks to their operational viability.
With potential Medicaid reductions looming, experts argue that any additional funding—particularly for IT and cybersecurity—will be invaluable for rural providers. Alan Morgan, CEO of the National Rural Health Association, emphasized that the program represents a significant financial commitment, but the effectiveness of the funding distribution remains uncertain.
The RHT program, managed by CMS, targets five critical strategic areas: technological innovation to enhance care delivery and security, initiatives to improve rural health and preventive care, sustainable access to healthcare, workforce development, and innovative care models that enhance health outcomes.
CMS has specified that $25 billion will be allocated equally to states qualifying for the grant, while the remaining funds will be distributed based on state applications that demonstrate potential impacts on rural health. The application deadline for states is November 5, with decisions on awardees expected by December 31.
Despite the promise of these funds, concerns linger regarding whether they will adequately meet the needs of rural healthcare entities. For example, in Minnesota, the presence of around 200 critical access hospitals raises questions about equitable funding distribution, which could result in insufficient financial support per facility.
Moreover, there is a pressing need for rural healthcare organizations to engage in meaningful collaborations, as sustainability is paramount. Ensuring that funding contributes to long-term infrastructure rather than one-off investments will be crucial. Experts, including those from OCHIN, underscore the importance of federal investments in cybersecurity and health IT to enhance resilience among rural healthcare providers.