Data Breach Notification,
Data Security,
Incident & Breach Response
With 25 years of experience in the cybersecurity sector, I have witnessed firsthand the evolution of vulnerability management (VM) from traditional scanning methods to integrated cloud solutions. Historically, VM has been central to enterprise cybersecurity protocols, characterized by a cycle of periodic scanning, prioritization, and remediation that often creates a false sense of security.
Modern security teams, particularly those in large organizations with intricate and dynamic infrastructures, require more than just traditional vulnerability scans or annual penetration tests to stay ahead of evolving threats. They need a scalable and efficient method to validate their exposure to real-world attacks across all levels of their infrastructure, especially as the implementation of Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) becomes increasingly prevalent.
While established offensive security programs may incorporate penetration testing and red teaming, a continual and scalable means of validating exposure remains an unmet need. This gap is addressed by Adversarial Exposure Validation (AEV).
What is Adversarial Exposure Validation?
According to Gartner, Adversarial Exposure Validation (AEV) encompasses “technologies that deliver consistent, continuous and automated evidence of the feasibility of an attack.” This category of technologies, which includes automated penetration testing, red teaming, and breach and attack simulation (BAS), has emerged as a critical component in the modern security landscape.
AEV technologies are capable of autonomously executing attack scenarios across various vectors, such as email phishing, application infrastructures, and malware. They produce reports that align with established security frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK, offering attack scoring and prioritized lists of vulnerabilities, which aid security teams in assessing the potential impact of each exposure. Crucially, they provide actionable remediation measures to help organizations enhance their defenses and fortify their security posture.
In essence, unlike static assessments, AEV enables security teams to test, validate, and respond to exposures as frequently as necessary. The authentic value of AEV lies not only in its identification of vulnerabilities but also in its ability to demonstrate what is actually exploitable, showcasing how real-world attackers would navigate security controls to exploit those vulnerabilities effectively.
The Gaps in Current Cybersecurity Strategies
While traditional VM programs have their merits, they often depend on manual penetration testing, red teaming, and vulnerability scanning tools that present organizations with significant challenges in today’s threat environment. Often, techniques like Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) provide only project-based assessments, which can be insufficient. Vulnerability scanners may generate extensive lists of vulnerabilities but often fail to contextualize these risks adequately, leaving organizations uncertain about which exposures are truly exploitable.
The fragmented nature of these approaches typically lacks the perspective of a real-world attacker, missing the crucial aspect of lateral movement to uncover exploitable pathways. Most notably, these methodologies do not furnish continuous, real-time insights into actual risks, leaving security leaders without the confidence to prioritize remediation efforts effectively.
Although penetration testing, red teaming, and vulnerability scanning remain integral to any proactive security strategy, security teams require more than isolated snapshots of insight. Continuous, validated, and actionable visibility into real-world risks is essential.
How AEV Empowers Security Leaders
Gartner anticipates that by 2027, 40% of organizations will have adopted formal exposure validation initiatives, primarily relying on AEV technologies for maturity and consistency. This trend reflects the pressing need for security leaders to make informed decisions swiftly, optimizing their limited time, budget, and resources. Traditional security testing methods often fall short as their fragmented and point-in-time nature does not truly reflect the behavior of persistent, real-world attackers.
AEV addresses this critical requirement by enabling security leaders to make more informed decisions. The technology assesses which defenses are effective and where weaknesses lie by simulating multi-step attacks across various vectors. This not only delivers actionable insights into security controls but also equips leaders with the context necessary to understand vulnerabilities throughout their infrastructure.
Furthermore, AEV verifies actual exposure through automated attack simulations, utilizing a library of continuously updated scenarios that mirror evolving tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). This provides organizations with crucial intelligence for aligning with contemporary threats and allows security leaders to prioritize their remediation efforts based on realistic and likely attack paths.
Another significant advantage of AEV lies in its ability to scale offensive security operations. By automating repeated attack scenarios, AEV frees human experts to focus on complex testing processes without the need for additional personnel. Thus, AEV facilitates consistent, broader validation at scale, mitigating the burden on internal teams.
Such enhancements result in fewer assumptions and clearer priorities, enabling better decision-making grounded in the operational realities faced by adversaries.
Reasons for AEV Adoption
Organizations are recognizing the strategic importance of AEV for varied reasons. Some are motivated primarily by the goal of reducing threat exposure and are integrating AEV into their CTEM programs for real-time validation of vulnerabilities. Others, particularly those heavily invested in security tools, external providers, and internal teams, find that AEV offers valuable data to justify changes and demonstrate the return on investment for their cybersecurity efforts.
Whether organizations aim to diminish exposure risks or optimize existing security expenditures, AEV provides a proactive and data-driven approach that aligns seamlessly with CTEM objectives.
Why Choose BreachLock AEV?
BreachLock AEV distinguishes itself as a leading SaaS-based, agentless platform powered by generative AI, simulating attacks across the entire attack surface—including internal and external environments, applications, and APIs—with zero infrastructure complexity.
This platform is fully cloud-based, requires no agents or physical hardware, and can be set up in minutes on standard operating systems. BreachLock AEV ensures comprehensive attack coverage with unified testing capabilities encompassing hybrid and cloud-native setups. Notably, it emphasizes web applications and APIs, regarding them as a priority rather than an afterthought.
BreachLock AEV allows clients to initiate unlimited tests swiftly, granting full control over testing conditions. The platform includes visual asset scoping and exclusion options, features a kill-switch for immediate test cessation, and operates independently of service teams or deployment timeframes.
With a single license covering unlimited testing without additional costs per test, asset, or surface, BreachLock AEV grows seamlessly with your organizational needs.
To explore how BreachLock AEV can advance your CTEM strategy, schedule a discovery call today.
About BreachLock
BreachLock is a recognized leader in the field of offensive security, providing scalable and continuous security testing solutions. Trusted by enterprises worldwide, BreachLock delivers human-led and AI-powered attack surface management, penetration testing, red teaming, and AEV services that empower security teams to proactively counter adversaries. Committed to making proactive security the standard, BreachLock is shaping the future of cybersecurity through automation and expert-driven strategies.
Understand your risks. Connect with BreachLock today!
