Encryption & Key Management,
Endpoint Security,
Security Operations
Withdrawal of Advanced Data Protection for UK Users May Have Global Repercussions

Apple’s recent decision to deactivate its iCloud end-to-end encryption feature for users in the United Kingdom has raised significant concerns among privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts. This move, believed to be influenced by a request from the British government for backdoor access, could have implications that extend well beyond UK borders.
On Friday, Apple suspended its Advanced Data Protection feature, which previously allowed content stored in iCloud, such as messages and photos, to be accessed only on trusted devices. Users were forced to disable the feature or risk losing their access to important iCloud services.
Matthew Green, an applied cryptography professor at Johns Hopkins University, expressed alarm over the potential exposure of data to state-sponsored attackers as a result of this policy change. He indicated that the U.K. government’s demands reflect a troubling direction for digital rights globally.
Signal’s President, Meredith Whittaker, criticized the U.K. government’s approach to encryption as a “digitally illiterate” decision that undermines the core tenets of cybersecurity. Whittaker highlighted that Apple’s move not only jeopardizes the security of UK users but also impacts anyone sharing sensitive information with them.
This development can be viewed within the context of the longstanding tussle between law enforcement and technology companies over encryption. The debate has been ongoing since the introduction of consumer encryption in the late 20th century. Companies like Apple, WhatsApp, and Signal argue that weakening encryption to allow access for governments opens doors for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities.
Under the Investigatory Powers Act of 2016, the UK government is empowered to issue “technical capability notices” that compel tech firms to implement measures ensuring compliance with access requests for user data. Critiqued by opponents as a “Snooper’s Charter,” this law prohibits companies from disclosing such requests and raises serious concerns regarding users’ rights and privacy.
Gus Hosein, executive director at Privacy International, pointed out that the scope of such government orders is unprecedented and continues to expand, presenting a unique challenge to cybersecurity on a global scale. He emphasized that no other nation possesses similar capabilities to enforce such demands on tech companies.
In response to the ongoing developments, British cybersecurity expert Josh Moore launched a petition seeking to ensure that user security and fundamental rights are not compromised due to the dismantling of the Advanced Data Protection feature. If successful, the petition could bring attention to the government’s obligations towards user security.
In a statement, an Apple representative reaffirmed the company’s commitment to offering the highest level of security for UK users, rejecting any notions of creating backdoors or master keys for its products. However, the U.K. Home Office has not yet provided comments regarding this controversial request.