Cyberwarfare / Nation-State Attacks,
Fraud Management & Cybercrime
Iranian Authorities Claim Intentional Internet Disruptions to Counter Israeli Cyber Threats
Iranian officials announced on Wednesday that the ongoing nationwide internet disruptions are intentional measures designed to “stabilize networks” amid anticipated Israeli cyber operations. This claim follows widespread missile activities attributed to Israel, raising concerns over an escalating cyber conflict.
Fatemeh Mohajerani, a spokesperson for the Iranian government, described the internet restrictions as “temporary, targeted, and controlled,” advising citizens to remain indoors as thousands reportedly evacuated from urban areas, particularly Tehran. The restrictions aim to reduce internet bandwidth by as much as 80 percent, a tactic intended to impede potential covert actions backed by Israel.
The blackout strategies align with fears of imminent cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, both in Israel and the United States. Analysts warn that Iran may leverage its cyber capabilities in response, recalling a historical pattern of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks that targeted American financial institutions. This form of retaliation reveals the multi-dimensional nature of modern cyber warfare.
Reports indicate that Iranian authorities have instituted a ban on government officials using internet-connected devices, citing security concerns about potential Israeli surveillance of military and governmental leaders. This restriction extends to personal security personnel, as even their use of telecommunication devices is limited by state directives.
In a related development, WhatsApp, a widely used messaging platform in Iran, countered allegations from state media asserting that it collects user data for Israeli intelligence purposes. In a statement to the Associated Press, the company clarified its privacy policies, emphasizing that it does not track precise locations or share user data with governments, warning that such unfounded accusations could justify increasing censorship at a critical moment for citizens seeking secure communication methods.
