Lawmakers Raise Concerns Over Security Risks as DOGE Operates Within Federal Systems
Democratic legislators in the U.S. have expressed significant alarm over the federal task force, operating under the guidance of billionaire Elon Musk, that is reportedly accessing critical federal data systems. They are urging investigations into potential security breaches that have seemingly allowed aides to Musk to access substantial amounts of American citizens’ data.
Members of the House Homeland Security committee stated in a letter that the “Department of Government Efficiency” is “running roughshod across federal networks, accessing untold amounts of information about Americans in complete disregard for security and privacy standards.” It’s important to note that DOGE, a technology unit within the White House previously referred to as the U.S. Digital Service, is not a recognized federal department.
The lawmakers highlighted that foreign adversaries such as China are consistently attempting to compromise federal agency networks to gather exploitable intelligence about U.S. officials and citizens. They pointed out that existing U.S. government policies designed to protect sensitive data must also apply to Musk and his associates.
Additionally, Democratic senators on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence have raised concerns about the lack of information provided to Congress or the public regarding formal hires within DOGE prior to granting them broad access to classified materials and personal data belonging to Americans.
Critics have underscored the existing strict cybersecurity protocols for accessing federal networks that they argue DOGE is failing to uphold, especially in light of reports that Musk’s aides have connected personal devices to sensitive governmental systems. Such actions raise serious implications for cybersecurity, reflecting potential vulnerabilities within federal data systems.
The Department of Treasury had announced that a DOGE technology executive would receive “read-only access” to federal payment systems; however, this move has done little to appease critics. Reports have emerged alleging that Musk’s aides removed senior career employees from the Office of Personnel Management’s data systems, which experts warn could heighten the risks of cybersecurity breaches that threaten exposed sensitive information of millions of Americans.
Compounding the situation, a recent memo from acting OPM director Charles Ezell may facilitate the process for Musk’s associates to occupy formal governmental technology roles by reclassifying the Chief Information Officer (CIO) position as open to political appointees, which historically would be limited to career civil service positions. This modification suggests a shift in policy that could amplify influence over government technology decisions.
As this situation unfolds, House Homeland Security Committee Chair Bennie Thompson has introduced a resolution demanding that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem provide critical information on how DOGE accessed data systems within the Department of Homeland Security. The scrutiny from lawmakers, compounded by Musk’s unprecedented access to federal data systems, raises substantial concerns regarding the safeguarding of American citizens’ personal information.
