In a notable development in the world of domestic extremism, Robert Rundo, an American neo-Nazi and co-founder of the Rise Above Movement (RAM), was sentenced today to federal prison for orchestrating violent attacks against ideological opponents at political rallies in California during 2017. This culmination follows a six-year legal saga characterized by two case dismissals, three appellate reversals, and his extradition from multiple countries. Rundo’s sentencing reflects a significant legal response to his role in promoting violent extremism rooted in far-right ideologies.
Rundo was convicted along with several RAM affiliates for conspiracy to violate the federal Anti-Riot Act. His group, which functioned as both a fight club and a street gang, was heavily involved in planning and executing assaults against perceived political adversaries at various events, including the notorious Unite the Right rally in Virginia. While Rundo faces years behind bars, the problematic legacy of his movement persists, with affiliates operating worldwide and sustaining their violent agendas.
Since his initial arrest in 2018, Rundo has played a pivotal role in extending RAM’s influence beyond American borders. His efforts have led to the establishment of “Active Clubs,” a global network of far-right fight clubs. These organizations share ideological underpinnings with other extremist entities, forming a lethal combination with skinhead groups and neofascist political movements across continents including North America, Europe, and South America. Current assessments indicate that there are numerous Active Clubs actively recruiting and maintaining their presence in various countries.
Active Clubs may appear innocuous at first glance; they typically engage in activities such as hiking, combat sports training, and fostering camaraderie among members. However, the underlying motivations often align with extremist ideologies. These groups frequently intersect with more radical organizations, including the Patriot Front and criminal skinhead groups like Hammerskins. Some Active Clubs are reportedly shifting toward direct political intimidation and violence, reminiscent of the tactics employed by the Rise Above Movement before them.
Rundo has articulated the necessity for a mass movement, cautioning against the integration of individuals from online spheres into physical activism without proper skills or experience. He advocates for Active Clubs to serve as introductory platforms, bridging the divide between online extremist communities and real-world action, thereby enhancing skills among new recruits to prepare them for more organized efforts.
Research conducted by the Southern Poverty Law Center underscores the troubling nature of the Active Club structure. Analysts point to the model’s low entry barriers and emphasis on community that facilitates recruitment from outside existing extremist circles. As operational networks become increasingly transnational, the flexibility of the Active Club framework enables easier connections among extremists globally.
As business owners and organizational leaders evaluate the implications of such extremist movements, it is essential to consider the inherent cybersecurity risks they pose. These organizations may exploit digital platforms to recruit, communicate, and organize, making them potential targets for cybersecurity initiatives.
With the rise of these networks, monitoring for signs of ideological extremism should be prioritized. Adversary tactics identified in the MITRE ATT&CK framework, such as initial access, persistence, and privilege escalation, may inform understanding of how such movements could leverage technology for recruitment and coordination. Engaging with this framework can provide critical insight into the complex landscape of modern extremism and the cybersecurity challenges it presents.
