SinoTrack GPS Devices Exposed: Default Passwords Allow Remote Vehicle Control

June 11, 2025
IoT Security / Vulnerability

Recent security vulnerabilities in SinoTrack GPS devices could enable unauthorized remote control of specific functions in connected vehicles, including location tracking. According to an advisory from the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), “Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to access device profiles without authorization through the common web management interface.” This access may enable attackers to execute functions such as tracking vehicle location and, where applicable, disconnecting the fuel pump.

The vulnerabilities impact all versions of the SinoTrack IoT PC Platform. Below is a brief overview of the identified flaws:

  • CVE-2025-5484 (CVSS score: 8.3) – Weak authentication in the central SinoTrack device management interface due to the reliance on a default password and a username that serves as an identifier.

SinoTrack GPS Devices Expose Vulnerabilities for Remote Vehicle Control

On June 11, 2025, significant security vulnerabilities were identified in SinoTrack GPS devices, which could be leveraged by attackers to manipulate certain remote functions of connected vehicles and monitor their locations. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued an advisory warning about these risks, emphasizing that unauthorized access to the device profiles via a widely used web management interface could enable nefarious actors to perform actions such as tracking a vehicle’s location and, in some instances, disabling power to the fuel pump.

The vulnerabilities reportedly affect all iterations of the SinoTrack IoT PC Platform, creating a broad scope of risk for users of these devices. CISA’s advisory highlighted two specific flaws, notably CVE-2025-5484, which has been assigned a CVSS score of 8.3, indicating a critical level of severity. This particular vulnerability arises from inadequate authentication measures within the central management interface of SinoTrack devices, primarily due to the reliance on default usernames and passwords.

Attackers exploiting these vulnerabilities would likely employ tactics consistent with those outlined in the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Initial access could be gained through unsecured management credentials, allowing attackers to escalate privileges and gain unauthorized control over critical functionalities of the vehicle systems. The weaknesses present in these devices exemplify a broader issue within the IoT landscape, where default security settings continue to provide easy points of entry for cybercriminals.

The implications of these vulnerabilities extend beyond mere inconvenience; they pose substantial risks to vehicle owners and, by extension, public safety. Vehicle brands that utilize SinoTrack’s technology for tracking and management services may find themselves vulnerable to attacks that could culminate in unauthorized access to sensitive operational functions.

As a precaution, business owners utilizing SinoTrack’s GPS technology are strongly advised to modify default system settings immediately and implement stricter security protocols. Ensuring robust password policies and regular system updates could mitigate the risks associated with these vulnerabilities.

In conclusion, the vulnerabilities identified within SinoTrack GPS devices highlight the critical need for vigilance in cybersecurity practices, particularly in the rapidly evolving IoT sector. Maintaining updated security measures is not just a best practice but an essential component of protecting business operations and ensuring consumer safety in an increasingly interconnected environment.

Source link