As the U.S. approaches another election cycle, unprecedented security measures are being implemented to safeguard the democratic process. The landscape of election security has evolved significantly, characterized by a suite of formidable protections that include drones, snipers, body armor, and bulletproof glass. These enhancements come in response to heightened threats and political tensions that election officials have faced in recent years, which have forced them to rethink their strategies for ensuring safety at polling places and electoral facilities.
Election officials across various counties, particularly in hotspots like Maricopa County, Arizona, are preparing to implement rigorous security protocols. This marks a stark departure from traditional election preparations, which typically focus on logistical concerns like ballot availability and equipment functionality. In light of past incidents and ongoing threats, election officials must now also proactively monitor for potential dangers while ensuring the safety of voters, workers, and their own staff.
Tammy Patrick, a former election official in Maricopa County turned senior advisor at the Bolstering Elections Initiative, emphasized that the current political environment necessitates enhanced measures. Security features such as bulletproof glass, panic buttons, and fencing have become standard, alongside the addition of surveillance systems, cyber protections, and training on conflict de-escalation.
Maricopa County has notably become an emblem of election security militarization following various allegations of election fraud and conspiracies surrounding its counting processes. The county’s experience with a controversial recount prompted by GOP lawmakers has led to a pronounced escalation in protective measures at election facilities. County Recorder Stephen Richer described his office as a “fortress,” necessitating the navigation of extensive security infrastructure just to enter.
In preparation for the 2024 elections, Maricopa County is significantly ramping up its security provisions. Measures now include the deployment of a second layer of security fencing, the introduction of concrete barriers, and a strategy for transporting election workers from off-site locations due to limited parking. Furthermore, at the tabulation center, heightened security will incorporate metal detectors at all entrances, increased lighting, and even a contingent of snipers stationed on rooftops during election day.
The layered security protocols being adopted across the country reflect a growing recognition of the potential threats against the electoral process. These efforts place significant emphasis not just on physical security but also on the resilience of cyber infrastructure, aligning with techniques outlined in the MITRE ATT&CK Matrix. Techniques such as initial access through social engineering, persistence through exploitation of system vulnerabilities, and privilege escalation through compromised user accounts are crucial considerations for election security this cycle.
Business owners and stakeholders in the tech field should remain vigilant, as such measures signal a larger trend towards heightened security in environments prone to disruption. Understanding the implications of this militarization of the election process can inform broader cybersecurity strategies and preparedness for potential threats in their own operations. As the election draws near, the interplay between security protocols and the safeguarding of democratic values will remain a critical focus within the evolving landscape of cybersecurity.
